So far we have noted that there are different classes of
words which may occur at "m", and which are subject to different chaining
relationships, but we have not attempted a more precise description beyond the general
classification "m". We have seen, however, that the number of words which may
appear at "m" within a single nominal group is quite large. We shall now
consider these words in more detail.
We have already noted that words
like "the" precede the other classes of modifier. Words which may occur in this
"slot" in the nominal group structure are called DEICTICS. (Remember that this
refers to the set of paradigms, selection of one of which excludes the others e.g.
"my", "this"). They are also known as determiners or "pointer
words", so called because they function by "pointing" to something in the
context. They may be referring back to something which has been mentioned, or forward to
something which the speaker is going to say. Or they may indicate something which is
inherent in the situational context.
|
|||||||||||||||
In (a), "that" identifies the referent in terms of
its proximity to the speaker;
in example (b) "that"
refers to something mentioned previously, i.e. it is textual (note also that here
"that" is a pronoun and therefore the headword);
in example (c) "her"
refers to a person whose identity is known to the hearer and is also textual in that it
refers back to a preceding point in the text when the individual was named.
As well as the definite and
indefinite articles, other words which may occupy the deictic slot are demonstratives like
"these" and "those", the various possessive forms such as
"my", "John's" etc., and quantifiers such as "some",
"every", "enough". Note that the possessive form of a common noun may
follow a deictic. This can be interpreted as a rankshifted nominal group.
|
|||||||||||||||
Functional
Systems
Some
deictic words have a special relationship to the
headword which distinguishes them from other classes of modifiers, namely the system of
number or plurality. This relates to whether the nominal group headword may be classed as
"countable" or "uncountable", and governs the selection of
demonstratives and words like "all", "every", "another",
"some", "either" etc (note that possessives are
not governed by this
system, and are in this respect unmarked).
A second system also operates in
terms of which deictics are either NON-SPECIFIC or
SPECIFIC in meaning. For instance, the
contrast between "a" and "the" arises from this distinction, for the
former is used in a general sense, since it does not identify its referent specifically,
but means "an unspecified member of the class of things denoted by the
headword", whereas the selection of "the" indicates that
the referent is in
some way known and can be assigned a particular identity. Thus if I say "an
apple" this does not indicate which particular apple I am referring to, but if I say
"the apple" this suggests that you know which apple I am talking about, either
from its context or place in the text.
As well as the definite article,
other specific deictics are the demonstrative and
possessive pronouns, and other
possessive forms (e.g. John's, his brother's).
Non-specific
deictics include the
indefinite article and other expressions of singularity (e.g. each,
every, either);
expressions of duality (e.g. both, neither); indefinite
quantifiers (e.g. some, any,
much); and expressions of totality (e.g.
all).
|
This can also be represented as follows, where the systems operate simultaneously:- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
These systems occur simultaneously, and interact in a complex way. Given that we can identify three classes of noun headword, which may be uncountable, countable singular and countable plural, we can describe six functional classes of deictic. These are:-
|
* Some nouns are optionally
countable or uncountable:-
|
|||||
In such cases the selection of deictic is still governed by
whether such nouns function as countable or non-countable in each particular instance.
* Note
also that the zero article does itself carry a deictic function, as in the above "I'd
like two coffees". Compare with the following:
|
|||||
e.g. I'd like the two coffees. | |||||
The
zero article is non-specific whereas the latter use of
the definite article clearly identifies the referent - i.e. it says "you know which
two coffees I am referring to".
|
|||||
Summary
We can say in summary that the function of the
deictic
element in the nominal group is to identify the headword in terms of its degree of
specificity and the extent to which it is known to both speaker and hearer.
Specific
deictics identify the referent demonstratively in
terms of
|
|||||
(i) | its proximity to the speaker (e.g. "this/that", "which/what"); | ||||
(ii) | in terms of its textual reference (e.g. "That's a good idea"); | ||||
(iii) | in terms of possession (e.g. Mary's book). | ||||
(iv) | in terms of shared knowledge, as for example "the exam" means "you know which exam I am referring to". | ||||
Non-specific deictics indicate all, part, one or none of the class of thing which is represented by the headword, which is not more particularly identified textually or proximately to the speaker / hearer in any of the ways mentioned above. These also express polarity in terms of positive/negative. | |||||
e.g. all / none, some / any, either / neither |
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar